Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion regarding appeals of orders denying relief from the automatic stay. Generally, the automatic stay (section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code) prevents creditors from taking action against the debtor’s assets outside the bankruptcy process. In order to continue debt collection efforts, creditors can file a
U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court Opinion: Bankruptcies Do Not Revoke TM Licenses
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Posted in Bankruptcy Appeals
This article is written by Elizabeth A. Patton and originally appeared on the Fox Advertising Law blog, https://advertisinglaw.foxrothschild.com
This week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC N/K/A Old Cold LLC case previously blogged about here and here. The issue in that case was whether, when…
Cert Granted in TM Bankruptcy Case
By Elizabeth A. Patton on
As I previously blogged about, there is a circuit split as to whether, when a trademark owner/licensor files for bankruptcy, the licensee of the trademark can legally continue use of the mark or whether the trademark owner/licensor can reject its obligations under the licensing agreement and effectively prohibit the licensee’s continued use of the mark. …
How Bankruptcy Effects Rights Under Trademark Licenses
When a trademark licensor files for bankruptcy, can the licensees of their trademarks continue using those marks, or does the licensor have the right to prohibit their continued use? On Fox’s Above the Fold blog covering advertising law, partner Elizabeth Patton recently wrote a post discussing this open question, which sits at the heart of…
U.S. Supreme Court finds Debt obtained by False Promises to Pay, Dischargeable
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
Samuel Goodstein writes:
The U.S. Supreme Court resolved a dispute about whether debts obtained by false promises to pay (or fraud) can be discharged in bankruptcy.
On June 4, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion affirming the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling that false statements related to a single…
The Safe Harbor Provision of the Bankruptcy Code Redefined
The United States Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in which it held that the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor provision § 546(e) does not prevent a trustee from clawing back transfers involving securities and financial institutions in circumstances when such institutions serve as mere pass-through entities for the transfer. The decision, Merit Management Group, LP …
Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling in Lakeridge Provides Little Guidance on Evaluating Creditors as Non-Statutory Insiders
By Fox Rothschild LLP on
On March 5, 2018, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC, which addressed a single question: Whether the Ninth Circuit properly reviewed for clear error (rather than de novo) the Bankruptcy Court’s determination that a certain individual was not qualify as a non-statutory insider. The…